Earth Not Warming Confirm Data

Data gathered from over 3,000 measuring points on land and sea has confirmed that the earth indeed has stopped warming since 1997, according to the British Met Office, which is the meteorological center of Great Britain.

The dishonest proponents of global warming have known this for years, which is why they changed their identification of the fictitious problem to climate change. Doing that, they can now disingenuously use any change in temperature to back their claims, which in the end, is an attack on business and economic growth.

Here's what the Daily Mail reported:

The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week (October 2012).  

The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.

This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years. 

The new figures mean that the pause in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. . . . The new figures mean that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. 

The new data, compiled from more than 3,000 measuring points on land and sea, was issued  quietly on the Internet, without any media fanfare, and, until today, it has not been reported.
This stands in sharp contrast  to the release of the previous  figures six months ago, which went only to the end of 2010 – a very warm year. 

Ending the data then means it is possible to show a slight warming trend since 1997, but 2011 and the first eight months of 2012 were much cooler, and thus this trend is erased. . . . 

From the start of 1997 until August 2012, however, figures released last week show the answer is zero: the trend, derived from the aggregate data collected from more than 3,000 worldwide measuring points, has been flat. 

Not that there has been any  coverage in the media, which usually reports climate issues assiduously, since the figures were quietly release online with no accompanying press release – unlike six months ago when they showed a slight warming trend.. . . 

But according to increasing numbers of serious climate scientists, it does suggest that the computer models that have for years been predicting imminent doom, such as  those used by the Met Office and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are flawed, and that the climate is far more complex than the models assert.

This is a blistering conclusion that now much defended point by point by the proponents of global warming, or they'll have to admit they have either outright lied, or have another agenda behind pushing the scam on the global public.

Of course the evidence against global warming is now irrefutable, so they'll have to change their tactics and not even attempt to defend their erroneous position.

The tactics, since they are now no longer believed by an increasing number of people, will have to be to persuade politicians to force laws and taxes on corporations and people no matter if it needs to be or not.

For Christians, we need to pray against this evil, as it will do more to undermine the liberties and economic well-being of a growing number of Americans and other global economies which it would have a negative impact, which will ultimately affect the followers of Jesus Christ.

Climategate 2.0: EMails Reveal IPCC Corruption

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is under fire again, as not unexpectedly, a new batch of e-mails, already being dubbed Climategate 2.0, underscore the outrageous corruption of the agency, which is no longer even trying to operate as scientists, but rather whores for those who have enormous interests in the perpetuation of the global warming, climate change hoax.

Of the approximate 5,000 emails released to the public by an anonymous source, so far it confirms levels of corruption among those so-called scientists exploring what is nothing more than a political cause that can no longer be identified as science.

Among the released emails, it is specifically confirmed that global warming or climate change is no longer considered a scientific inquiry, but, as mentioned, a political cause.

The emails also say the scientists involved are attempting to hide data and results, rather than release them in a timely manner to the public.

Also per the communications between these "scientists" is the admission the alleged science behind the global warming hoax is extremely weak, and reliant upon planned manipulation of the data and facts.

Some emails released:

“Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive … there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC,” wrote Tom Wigley, who has been under fire for an email in Climategate 1.0, where he said the official Climategate scientists "must get rid of" an editor of a peer-reviewed science journal because he didn't agree with the official assertions.

“Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary,” communicated Peter Thorne of the UK Met Office.

“I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,” Thorne continued.

Incredibly, they have even put forward the idea of generating a message that has no basis in fact which would be then used to guide what is in the released IPCC reports. Jonathan Overpeck, coordinating lead author for the IPCC’s most recent climate assessment, said, “The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out” of IPCC reports.

Penn State University scientist Michael Mann, has been attempting to recruit an investigative reporter to "investigate and expose” scientist Steve McIntyre, who is skeptical of the global warming theory.

What these emails have already proved, is there is absolutely no basis for global warming or climate change, as it is completely driven be those with political agendas, rather than any basis in reality.

The so-called scientists of the IPCC, and those attempting to make names for themselves by associating themselves with them, are confirmed to be corrupt and liars.

There is no man-made global warming, and climate change is the normal process of weather patterns since the creation of the universe by Jesus Christ.

No more proof is needed to confirm global warming is a hoax, and there is no science behind the politically-driven agenda.

Global Warming "Science" Doesn't Exist

The more and more people check under the hood of the assertions made by so-called scientists concerning not only global warming, but man-caused global warming, the more it is revealed that is is science fiction, rather than anything based upon reality.

The CO2 model used by scientists as a means of predicting global warming is completely false, and has failed miserably as a predictive model.

Whether it is global warming by nature or global warming allegedly caused by people, neither have been relevant for the last 11 years, as it hasn't been taking place during that time.

Global warming, as well as cooling, is simply part of the way Jesus Christ created the earth and nature. There have been ebbs and flows throughout thousands of years, and the idea of CO2 being a model is completely off.

Why does the assertion of man-made global warming continue to be listened to in light of the junk science behind it? It's the old and tired agenda of progressives (socialists) and those wanting to implement one-world governance.

When socialists failed to prove its superiority to capitalism, they've gone off on numerous other journeys and focuses in attempts to implement their ultimate agenda of ruling the world.

Their strategy is to create fear in the general population in order to wear them down so they will allow the enactment of rules and regulations which will ultimately enslave people.

Scientists backing this are those seeking fortune and fame in a place in the new world order.

This is why the data concerning global warming and/or climate change are continually misrepresented or found to be outright forged.

We must be a people of discernment and never take at face value what the world is throwing out there as truth, in the sense of what the data are saying. The elites and arrogant always want to control the actions and parameters of the regular people.

Christians must not be so gullible in embracing these assertions and lies, even it if makes us unpopular, or our reputations take a hit.

After all, Paul admonishes in Philippians to have the same mind in us that Christ had, which in part was to make ourselves of no reputation.

Numerous compromising "Christians" have already embraced the global warming and evolution camps (as two examples), so they don't have to suffer the ridicule, ostracisation and rejection that accompanies holding to Biblical revelation and principles.

The reason why is they want to have, in most cases, a career in their chosen fields. We must repent of this and hold to the truths revealed to us in the Holy Scriptures.


Sources:

More Fraud Concerning AGW/CC

Global warming climatologists hiding unfavorable key data concerning past global temperature proxies for years

More on hiding temperature declines

Another Scientist on Global Warming Hoax

Another of the thousands of scientists refuting the junk "science" behind climate change or global warming has added his contribution to the debate.

David Deming, who is a geophysicist, associate professor of arts and sciences at the University of Oklahoma, said "Anyone who is an honest and competent scientist must be a denier" of global warming.

I'm a denier for several reasons. There is no substantive evidence that the planet has warmed significantly or that any significant warming will occur in the future. If any warming does occur, it likely will be concentrated at higher latitudes and therefore be beneficial. Climate research has largely degenerated into pathological science, and the coverage of global warming in the media is tendentious to the point of being fraudulent. Anyone who is an honest and competent scientist must be a denier.

Reject any of the stream of lies associated with global warming from "court" scientists of the governments around the world.

There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that man has contributed to one iota of global warming, or that there is even such a thing as global warming. So you can sleep easy my friends while rejecting and opposing this lie.

Global Warming Lie Results in Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Resigning

The outright lie by the American Physical Society, supposedly the premier physics society, that concerning man made global warming, "the evidence is incontrovertible."

Dr. Ivar Giaever, winner of the the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, resigned from the now disreputable physics society, saying simply in an email: "I resign from APS."

Giaever said in the same email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society, "In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?"

The expected backlash against the immoral physics society resulted in it placing an addendum concerning its statement. It now says, "The word 'incontrovertible' ... is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas. The observational data indicate a global surface warming of 0.74 °C (+/- 0.18 °C) since the late 19th century."

Even the use of the word 'incontrovertible' within the group itself has stirred up controversy, as it generated debate which resulting in the above statement.

Giaever said about the assertion, "The claim … is that the temperature has changed from -288.0 to -288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this 'warming' period."

His assessment lines up with the facts, which are the Earth has had warmer periods of time in the past than it is now. It also must be taken into account that the predictive models concerning man made global warming or climate change have failed time after time.

Why is all of this pursued by scientists in light of the mounting evidence their theory is wrong? They're after the grant money, for one, by attempting to appease politicians around the globe attempting to use the fake issue to shore up the fantasy of these globalists to create a world government.

The good news is the story is getting out that there has never been a consensus among scientists about man made global warming, and bold steps by men of integrity like Dr. Ivar Giaever continue to pound at the falsehoods of the climate change theory, getting the word out to the general public, which according to a Rasmussen Reports public opinion poll, now to the tune of 57 percent, understand there is a lot of disagreement among the scientific community concerning global warming.

Also very important is the growing perception among the public that at minimum, some scientists have falsified research in order to support what is increasingly being realized as a scientific religion, based upon a belief system and theories, not upon sound scientific observation and conclusions.

The bottom line: There is a continual push by those interesting in imposing a global government upon the world to either create or expand upon uncertainties which engender fear in people in order to convince them to give more and more control to governments around the world, and ultimately to a global, centralized government.

Just ask yourself the question as to why something is being pushed so fast and hard by governments, scientists and the mainstream media. When you remove the rocks, underneath them you'll usually find the one world government fetish.

Global Warming, Climate Change Models Falling Apart

The ongoing press by those hoping to use the so-called global warming or climate change as an excuse to participate in massive government intervention in the global economy is being again undercut, this time by the first results of CERN lab’s CLOUD (“Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets”) experiment, which offers support for a “heliocentric” rather than “anthropogenic” approach to climate change.

That means at this stage, as thousands of scientists have already stated, is the sun, not man, is the cause for changes in the weather.

According to CERN, this means that "climate models will have to be revised."

"[I]t is clear that the treatment of aerosol formation in climate models will need to be substantially revised, since all models assume that nucleation is caused by these vapours [sulphuric acid and ammonia] and water alone."

Like the false theory of evolution, which scientists have been abandoning in droves, the continual moving of the goalposts suggest the theory is completely unsupportable, even in light of the faith of those who desperately want to create the type of global governance used to control all aspects of the economy, and by extension, people's lives.

It's of course another way for the progressives to steal money from Americans and other Western countries in order to use it in theirs. We've seen how that has worked out after decades of foreign aid which has been almost completed wasted.

This should offer more than enough evidence for American politicians to put a hold on the outrageous idea of reducing the size of the coal industry, based on the unproven theory, and in some cases, outright lie, that it is part of the cause of non-existent global warming.

More testing will be done. But there can be no doubt when it's all completed, it will be the sun that is found to be the most significant reason for changes in temperature and weather, not man.

Ignore the Global Warming Hoax and Know Christ

I don't like to get too far off of the focus of this blog and website, which is to encourage everyone to make one thing their sole aim in life, and that is to know Jesus Christ, who is willing and able to help and empower you on that endeavor.

But one of the many hoaxes connected to a series of hoaxes continues to disrupt and distract Christians from that endeavor, so I thought I'd include an article from another writer here to deal with one of the environmental hoaxes: global warming.

Like I said, the point is to understand the reasoning behind global warming fiction, and then discard it as a distraction to knowing and learning Christ, and get back on that path, which is the purpose for our creation and existencel

Here's the article in its entirety:


It's Not Just That Global Warming Is Fake. What Matters Is Why This Fakery Is Being Promoted.

Global warming is based 100% on junk science. The most vocal promoters are not interested in the details of physical science. They are interested in two things: political control over the general public and the establishment of international socialism.

Junk Science vs. Real Science

For a detailed, footnoted, 12-page article, written by three scientists, two with Ph.D's from CalTech, click here.

This paper was sent to tens of thousands of natural scientists in the United States.
Over 31,000 scientists have put their reputations on the line and signed a politically incorrect petition opposing the 1997 Kyoto agreement or protocol. Here is a photocopy of a signed petition.

Here is a letter from a former president of the National Academy of Sciences. He asks recipients of the petition to sign it.

Back in the 1970's, the bugaboo was the coming ice age, as this Time Magazine article promoted. Not to be outdone, Newsweek got on board. The article warned: "Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects." Want more examples? Click here.

It, too, was based on junk science. It, too, had the same solution: government control over the economy. The goal never changes: government management over the economy. The justification has changed. If the voters won't accept control over their lives on the basis of one brand of junk science, maybe they will accept another. As they used to say in the Nixon Administration: "Let's run this up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes."

Socialism's Last Stand

The global warming movement is not about global warming. It is about the creation of an international political control arrangement by which bureaucrats who favor socialism can gain control over the international economy.

This strategy was stated boldly by economist Robert Heilbroner in 1990. Heilbroner, the multi-millionaire socialist and author of the best-selling history of economic thought, The Worldly Philosophers, wrote the manifesto for these bureaucrats. He did this in an article, "Reflections: After Communism," published by The New Yorker (Sept. 10, 1990).

In this article, he made an astounding admission. He said that Ludwig von Mises had been right in 1920 in his article, "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth." Mises argued that without private ownership, central planners could not know what any resource is worth to consumers. With no capital market, the planners would be flying blind.

Heilbroner said that for 70 years, academic economists had either ignored this article or dismissed it without answering it. Then Heilbroner wrote these words: "Mises was right."

Heilbroner was one of these people. There is no reference to Mises in The Worldly Philosophers.

This admission was the preliminary section of Heilbroner's manifesto. He was cutting off all hope by socialists that there is a theoretically plausible response to Mises. The free market economy will always outproduce a socialist economy. Get used to it, he said.

Then, in the second section, he called on his socialist peers to get behind the ecology movement. Here, he said, is the best political means for promoting central planning, despite its inefficiency. In the name of ecology, he said, socialists can get a hearing from politicians and voters.

The article is not online. An abstract is. Here is the concluding thought of the abstract.

The direction in which things are headed is some version of capitalism, whatever its title. In Eastern Europe, the new system is referred to as Not Socialism. Socialism may not continue as an important force now that Communism is finished. But another way of looking at socialism is as the society that must emerge if humanity is to cope with the ecological burden that economic growth is placing on the environment. From this perspective, the long vista after Communism leads through capitalism into a still unexplored world that roust [must?] be safely attained and settled before it can be named.

Heilbroner did not care that a worldwide government-run economic planning system would not be called called socialism. He just wanted to see the system set up.

Heilbroner's peers got the message. That was what Kyoto was all about.

Conclusion

If you like poverty, inefficiency, and bureaucratic controls over the economy, and therefore control over your choices, the "climate change" movement is ideal.

If you want to subsidize China and India, neither of which will enforce the rules laid down by unelected international bureaucrats, this movement is for you.

If you want to pay more for less energy, there is no better way than to pass the cap and tax bill which the House has passed. It will be sent to the U.S. Senate next week.
The rest of us should oppose it.

----- end article -----

Again, the point of including this on Acts 29 Review, is to understand the forces behind the global warming, climate change hoax, and not allow it to upset and distract you from the only important thing in life - knowing and fellowshipping with Jesus Christ.

Another Reason to Stay Focused on Christ - Not Environmental Fears and Hoaxes

We of course should need no reason other than Christ Himself to stay centered in Him, but a lot of people with a variety of agendas continue to hammer through the mainstream and online media that global warming - or as now called - climate change, is about to destroy the earth (yawn).

New evidence points to the continue absurdity and outright lie and/or incompetence of those perpetrating this fear on people in order to forward their hidden purposes.

As far as those of us who are believers, don't be tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine. Those scriptures aren't just talking about things concerning Christ and Christianity, but all the endless nonsense being spewed forth in the world, which when we trace it back, brings us to the temptation to continue eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, rather than the tree of life which is Christ.

Here's how one person called it: "Dr Allison said there was not any evidence of significant change in the mass of ice shelves in east Antarctica nor any indication that its ice cap was melting. 'The only significant calvings in Antarctica have been in the west,' he said. And he cautioned that calvings of the magnitude seen recently in west Antarctica might not be unusual.

"Ice shelves in general have episodic carvings and there can be large icebergs breaking off - I'm talking 100km or 200km long - every 10 or 20 or 50 years."

Amazingly, this article finishes saying this, "A paper to be published soon by the British Antarctic Survey in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is expected to confirm that over the past 30 years, the area of sea ice around the continent has expanded."

Now the question must be raised on why this has happend over the last 30 years, and so-called scientists were supposedly on the completely wrong side of the reality of the situation.

Of course we never hear much that the earth has been cooling for over a decade either. That wouldn't fit in with the global warming orthodoxy that is as false and unsubstantiated as anything you could come up with.

Many Christian believers must ask themselves why they believe such things, when in fact if you do a little digging, you can easily find out these types of assertions based on fear are the norm for people declaring the castrophic accurances based on nothing but their own psychotic fears and agendas.

We must again find Christ and Christ alone as our foundation. We are to never move off of Him, and when we stay founded upon His person, most of the things attempted to be foisted upon believers in Jesus can easily be identified as hoaxes.

There is far more evidence against global warming than mentioned here. The point is to never let this type of stuff be the "exception" that causes us to have to deal with supposed crisis.

By the way, this is one way you can tell when someone's trying to fool and deceive you: are they saying it's an exception, and are they saying it has to be dealt with now?

If so, you know they're full of BS. The reason why this type of garbage is thrown on us in this way is to attempt to create an artificial crisis in order that we can suspend our beliefs in the reality that surrounds us, and take actions based upon nothing but unproven theories.

The worst thing for followers of Christ is to allow ourselves to be taken in by these contiuous lies, and so take our focus and attention off of Christ and onto something that is supposed to be more important.

If we are socialized into behaving that way, there will always be the next crisis; always the next big thing; always the world-ending situation that we must give our money, time and attention to, or mankind as we know we won't survive.

Next time you hear this snakeoil assertion, no matter where it's coming from or what it's about, run for the hills, or better yet - simply ignore it.

The only true problems we want to spend time with is with helping the poor, working on building a healthy family, and fellowshipping with Christ and His people.

I'll touch more on these distractions and the truth or error behind them in the future. I hesistate to do it too much because it can open up a whole can of worms that distracts from the purpose of Acts29Review, which is to focus on the ongoing purpose of God which was determined before time or creation came into being. Now that's something we can give ourselves to.