Eco Evil: Windfarms Causing Global Warming

It's amazing that the only place where there has been global warming in the last decade is local and regional areas where they ghastly wind turbines dot the area. A report in the Telegraph said this:

Wind farms can cause climate change, according to new research, that shows for the first time the new technology is already pushing up temperatures. Usually at night the air closer to the ground becomes colder when the sun goes down and the earth cools. But on huge wind farms the motion of the turbines mixes the air higher in the atmosphere that is warmer, pushing up the overall temperature. Satellite data over a large area in Texas, that is now covered by four of the world's largest wind farms, found that over a decade the local temperature went up by almost 1C as more turbines are built. This could have long term effects on wildlife living in the immediate areas of larger wind farms. It could also affect regional weather patterns as warmer areas affect the formation of cloud and even wind speeds.

The bottom line is if the global warming, climate change lie hadn't been reported as fact by the media, we wouldn't no have damaging effects from these monstrosities which are doing harm, when fossil fuels are doing no damage, as the last twelve years of no rises in temperature have proven. It only confirm that green and mean and the eco movement is evil. Even after this report proponents are attempting to spin it as bad reporting rather than a fact of the misguided and destructive force the so-called green, eco movement has become.

Brethren, don't believe all these false teachings about global warming and climate change. When the diagnosis is wrong, then the attempts to fix the non-problem will make things worse, as all socialist, fascist endeavors do.

Kirk Cameron Boldly Schools Piers Morgan on Homosexual Sin

Actor Kirk Cameron boldly and truthfully schooled Piers Morgan and his viewers on the sin of homosexuality and the attempt to redefine marriage by practioners and advocates of the destructive lifestyle.

Responding to a question on homosexuals marrying, Cameron said, "Marriage is almost as old as dirt, and it was defined in the Garden between Adam and Eve. One man, one woman for life till death do you part. So I would never attempt to try to redefine marriage. And I don't think anyone else should either."

"So do I support the idea of gay marriage? No, I don't."

The perverse organization GLAAD responded by lying with this assertion from Herndon Graddick, Senior Director of Programs, "Cameron is out of step with a growing majority of Americans … with an increasing number of states recognizing marriage equality, Americans are seeing that marriage is about committed couples who want to make a lifelong promise to take care of and be responsible for each other and that gay and lesbian couples need equal security and legal protections. That's not 'redefining' anything."

The lie is that there is a "growing majority of Americans" that support so-called "marriage equality." That's an outright lie. The vast majority of Americans oppose homosexuality and homosexual marriage. That's the facts in the matter.

As for the alleged idea that states are supporting homosexuals getting married, that's not true either. Even California residents opposed homosexual marriage, as well as people from Iowa, but activist judges their forced it on the people, not the states or the voters.

Cameron accurately identified homosexuality as "destructive to so many of the foundations of civilization."

Cancer and Peer Review Scandal

Science has for too long hidden behind the idea of "peer review," where it is supposed to be a check and balance to conclusions asserted from research.

The problem of course is research money, corporate profits, narcissism and private agendas, whereby results can be cooked by scientists, and in fact are much more frequently than the average person knows.

Take the case of the recent revelation by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) at the U.S. Department of Health, whereby it was revealed he had "engaged in research misconduct by fabricating data that were included in two published papers" related to cancer research.

Fabrications include:

Oncogene February 2009, which found that HIC1, a protein thought to suppress tumor growth, is a 'central molecule in a novel mechanism controlling cell growth and that the disruption of this HIC1-mediated pathway may lead to abnormal cell proliferation and, ultimately, cancer.'

Molecular Endocrinology December 2009, which found 'reintroducing HIC1 into resistant breast cancer cells restored their sensitivity to the estrogen antagonists, indicating the existence of a novel regulatory mechanism for growth control of breast cancer cells.'

The Wall Street Journal reported on peer reviews:

"Just 22 retraction notices appeared in 2001, but 139 in 2006 and 339 last year. Through seven months of this year, there have been 210, according to Thomson Reuters Web of Science, an index of 11,600 peer-reviewed journals world-wide …

At the Mayo Clinic, a decade of cancer research, partly taxpayer-funded, went down the drain when the prestigious Minnesota institution concluded that intriguing data about harnessing the immune system to fight cancer had been fabricated. Seventeen scholarly papers published in nine research journals had to be retracted. A researcher, who protests his innocence, was fired. In another major flameout, 18 research journals have said they are planning to retract a total of 89 published studies by a German anesthesiologist …"

So-called peer reviewed scientific conclusions can no longer be considered legitimate, as the fraud and consequences inherent in the system, including the obvious conflict of interests, make it completely unreliable across about every "scientific" discipline their is out there.

For the falsified cancer results above it's particularly damning, as other publications have cited the material and doctors have made decisions for their patients based upon it.

This lying snake needs to be prosecute and sued into oblivion, as well as Boston University which allowed the fraud to go forward, suggesting incompetence or collusion.

The money involved in research is enormous, giving incentive for peer reviews to be based upon outright lies.

Spain Downgraded by S&P

The long-term debt rating of Spain was downgraded by Standard & Poor's, as the European Union flounders on the brink of extinction. And not too soon, I may add.

As for the banking system of Spain, Standard and Poor's said they see it continuing to weaken as the amount of troubled assets increase.

Standard & Poor's cut the long-term rating from "AA" to "AA-." They also have a "negative" outlook on the country, suggesting there could be even further rating cuts in the future. The short-term rating of "A-1+" was maintained for now.

Much of the rating downgrade was predicated on little or no growth prospects for the country, which continues to be weighed down by high unemployment, large private debt and tight credit.

Also of concern is the weakness of its immediate trading partners, which reinforces little or no growth going forward, and possibly contraction.

As with most of the countries in economic trouble, including the United States, the recession is being blamed for Spain's slow growth, while the socialist practices of entitlement and out of control spending weren't mentioned.

Until the size of government is limited, spending cut, and entitlement programs drastically reduced, nothing will change for these countries, as the spending is simply no longer sustainable.

In the case of the United States, they need to also cut back on military expansionism, along with entitlement and spending cuts.

Spain is now expected to grow at an anemic 0.8 percent in 2011, and possibly up to 1 percent in 2012. That's down from former projections of 1.5 percent.

Who knows what will happen once Greece defaults, which is a surety.

Dead Sea Scrolls on Internet

Called the most significant archeological discovery by many in the 20th century, the Dead Sea Scrolls have now been made available online for the first time on Monday.

The national museum of Israel and Google are working together to present the ancient scrolls on the Internet.

To begin with, what are considered the five most important of the Dead Sea Scrolls have been made available, including the Temple Scroll and the Book of Isaiah.

Included with the interactivity of the Scrolls will be the ability to translate the verses into English, zoom in and out, and to search for verses of interest.

The Israel Antiquities Authority, owns the majority of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and has their own project underway to have them almost all placed on the Internet by 2016.

Evil EPA Rampages Against Property Owners

The EPA is quickly morphing into an organization like the Federal Reserve, making decisions and taking actions they believe are above the law and the courts of the United States.

Mike and Chantell Sackett acquired a piece of land in a residential subdivision of Priest Lake, Idaho, and when they started developing it were ordered by the EPA to stop their improvements and bring the property back to its original condition, asserting it was protected wetlands.

One report said "the Environmental Protection Agency showed up on the building site, demanded that the work stop and issued a 'compliance order' that the couple remove the fill they had brought in, restore the land to its native condition, plant trees every 10 feet, fence it off and let it sit for three years."

"Then they would, for costs estimated at roughly a quarter of a million dollars, be allowed to "request" permission from the government to build on their own land.

"Or else, warned the agency, there is the possibility of fines of $37,500 per day – with the total now surpassing $40 million."

The Pacific Legal Foundation has taken up the case on behalf of the Sacketts, where attorney Damien Schiff will argue the case before the Supreme Court.

Schiff said, the Sacketts "bought property, and the government in effect has ordered them to treat the property like a public park."

"The EPA has not paid them a dime for that privilege. The regime we have operating now allows the EPA to take property without having to pay for it, or giving the owners the right to their day in court."

Schiff added that the authority attempted to be exercised by the EPA is extraordinary, saying there is "no question that the power the EPA is claiming it has under the Clean Water Act is significant."

"Even if you have a good basis the think the EPA is wrong, the EPA won't let you get into the courthouse. They are able to shut the courthouse door by issuing compliance orders that are not judicially reviewable."

The stakes in this case are amazingly high. If the Supreme Court allows this type of authority to the EPA, they are essentially being granted unlimited power within the parameters of the department, and could, without the availability of the courts to its victims, take whatever steps it chooses concerning the property of American citizens.

This is why the EPA as a government entity needs to be not just brought under control, but eliminated altogether, as it serves no function allowed for the government by Jesus Christ.

Majority Distrust U.S. Mainstream Media

Unsurprisingly, a Gallop poll found that 55 percent of Americans have little or not trust of mainstream media outlets, with 44 percent saying they have a fair amount of, or great deal of trust in major media outlets.

Concerning bias in mainstream media, 47 percent believe they are far too liberal, while 36 percent see it as being "just about right." Hilariously, 13 percent say mainstream media is too conservative.

Among Republicans, 75 percent say media are too liberal. Independents are split on the issue, with 50 percent saying media is too liberal. Moderates are also split, with 50 percent saying media are just about right. The majority of liberals see media as just about right, with 57 percent holding to that position.

The results of the poll are pretty much the same as they were in 2010.

"Mark of the Beast" in Oklahoma?

Citing the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, Kaye Beach filed a lawsuit in Oklahoma over a new rule that forces driver's license applicants to have a "biometric" digital photograph taken of them.

Commenting on the case, John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, said this, "Whether a biometric ID card in the form of a driver's license or other government-issued form of identification is the mark of the Beast or merely the long arm of Big Brother, the outcome remains the same – ultimate control by the government."

"As Kaye Beach's case makes clear, failing to have a biometric card can render you a non-person for all intents and purposes, with your ability to work, travel, buy, sell, access health care, and so on jeopardized," he added. The Rutherford Institute is representing Beach in the case.

According to the lawsuit, the scriptures Rev. 13:16-18 and 14:9-11 are cited, saying they specifically command "believers to not participate in a global numbering identification system using the number of man, and eternally condemns participation in that system."

The lawsuit was filed against the state of Oklahoma's Department of Public Safety and Public Safety Commissioner Michael C. Thompson, along with several others.

Wind Turbines Destructive to Oyster Industry

One of the dirty little secrets of the wind turbine industry is the amount of harm it does to wildlife.

Those wind turbine farms located on land are very destructive to birds and bats, killing tens of thousands of them, if not more annually.

When BP (NYSE:BP) had its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a big deal was made about the damage to wildlife, even thought it was extremely minimal, and not even close to the damage these wind turbine farms do in just one day to wildlife.

Evidently the media likes to show a few birds with oil on them. Unfortunately they don't show the mangled birds and bats.

Now as far as those wind turbines located in some parts of the sea, they can also be extremely destructive to wildlife via secondary effects.

For example, off the coast of Great Britain it has been extremely destructive to shrimp. That's because when the wind turbines are being put in place, and to a lesser extent, when they're operating, it attracts huge numbers of starfish which gorge on the shrimp. This is extremely destructive to the industry, and those within the shrimping industry fear they could lose their livlihoods over it.

For some reason when shrimp fishermen are impacted by oil that's a scandal, when they're affected by the even more brutal wind turbine industry, somehow it just doesn't matter, and the media largely ignores it.

Starfish come to the areas that are disturbed, such as in relationship to wind turbines, because they instinctively know when the area is disturbed they're going to be able to feed well.

Wind turbines are growing increasingly controversial, and the mainstream media, for the most part, refuses to point out the damage from these ugly monsters.

Progressives Attack "Paper Or Plastic?"

The liberal, progressives, or socialists, whatever moniker flavor they've chosen to use today, are again going pyscho, now wanting to force people in Las Angeles to shop with only reusable bags.

What the new proposed measure would do is disallow the use of paper or plastic bags in all the supermarkets located in L.A. It would also force the supermarkets to offer for sale or provice complimentary reusable or fiber bags only. If the supermarkets don't comply, there would be the imposition of a fine.

Never mind that it's been proven these reusable bags are dirty and filthy, as few people remember to continually clean them.

But this fascist attempt to force the will of the few on the many shows the incredible lack of clear thinking, or even the ability to clearly think through an issue, by the progressives.

This is another reason why people and businesses are fleeing the California cult.

Here we are in the midst of one of the worst economic times in U.S. history, and we have wicked people pursuing their bizarre goals of saving the planet at the expense of people and the health of the economy.

Even some of those in California are calling this proposal a "nightmare." The problem is this nightmare isn't just beginning in California, it has been going on for decades.

Women Who Abort Babies Develop Mental Health Problems

In an unsurprising conclusion of maybe the first honest study done concerning the effects of a woman cooperating in the murder of her baby through abortion, it was found that far more women face mental health issues how have had an abortion, than those that don't.

This is obvious if you've ever talked to women after they helped murder their children, as those I have met and talked to have always had regrets over the deed.

Published in the September 1 issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry, the authors of the study concluded this: "Results indicate quite consistently that abortion is associated with moderate to highly increased risks of psychological problems subsequent to the procedure."

The study had a strong representation of women, with 877,000 women participating, of which 164,000 had an abortion. Findings of the study were women who had an abortion were 81 percent more likely to have mental health problems. Participating in murder does that to a person.

Per the study, "Women who had an abortion were 34 percent more likely to develop an anxiety disorder, 37 percent more likely to experience depression, 110 percent more likely to abuse alcohol, 155 percent more likely to commit suicide, and 220 percent more likely to use marijuana."

Dr. Priscilla Coleman, professor of human development and family studies at Bowling Green State University, advised, "There are in fact some real risks associated with abortion that should be shared with women as they are counseled prior to an abortion."

In America alone, approximately 827,000 women still have an abortion on an annual basis.

Global Warming, Climate Change Models Falling Apart

The ongoing press by those hoping to use the so-called global warming or climate change as an excuse to participate in massive government intervention in the global economy is being again undercut, this time by the first results of CERN lab’s CLOUD (“Cosmics Leaving OUtdoor Droplets”) experiment, which offers support for a “heliocentric” rather than “anthropogenic” approach to climate change.

That means at this stage, as thousands of scientists have already stated, is the sun, not man, is the cause for changes in the weather.

According to CERN, this means that "climate models will have to be revised."

"[I]t is clear that the treatment of aerosol formation in climate models will need to be substantially revised, since all models assume that nucleation is caused by these vapours [sulphuric acid and ammonia] and water alone."

Like the false theory of evolution, which scientists have been abandoning in droves, the continual moving of the goalposts suggest the theory is completely unsupportable, even in light of the faith of those who desperately want to create the type of global governance used to control all aspects of the economy, and by extension, people's lives.

It's of course another way for the progressives to steal money from Americans and other Western countries in order to use it in theirs. We've seen how that has worked out after decades of foreign aid which has been almost completed wasted.

This should offer more than enough evidence for American politicians to put a hold on the outrageous idea of reducing the size of the coal industry, based on the unproven theory, and in some cases, outright lie, that it is part of the cause of non-existent global warming.

More testing will be done. But there can be no doubt when it's all completed, it will be the sun that is found to be the most significant reason for changes in temperature and weather, not man.

Rand Paul Blasts "Out of Control" EPA

Confirming he's a defender of the free and coal, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. blasted the Environmental Protection Agency over proposed rules which could devastate Kentucky and other states, as well as weaken the power grid in many areas of the country.

Paul said the EPA was an “out of control” bureaucracy that is waging a war the coal industry.

He said:

Coal is a vital sector of Kentucky’

s economy. More than 200,000 jobs in the commonwealth depend on it, including the jobs of about 18,000 coal miners. America’s coal miners produce the fuel for nearly half our nation’s electricity needs.

Yet, the out-of-control EPA has waged a war on coal and the families whose livelihoods depend upon it. Washington’s bureaucratic regulations and excessive taxation have sought to limit our energy choices and kill even more jobs during this recession.

As a defender of the free market and of coal, I will continue to fight back against the EPA and any other federal agency whose goal is to stifle coal production. I will continue to stand up for our miners in Washington as we continue to recognize the sacrifices they make to provide food for their families and energy for America.

Paul is absolutely correct, and we need to eliminate the EPA as an agency and slash the federal debt and federal spending levels, rather than attack productive and important industries like coal, which provide over 40 percent of America's electricity.

Picture the hell that will come if these new rules aren't rejected, and numerous places in the country experience man-made blackouts.

Will EPA Rules Destroy Power Grid?

Michele Bachmann recently stated about the EPA if she is elected president, “I guarantee you the EPA will have doors locked and lights turned off, and they will only be about conservation,” over its atrocious attack upon the American people, proposing new rules that will result in the closure of many power plants run by coal.

According to industry groups Edison Electric Institute and the American Legislative Exchange Council, the rules will be the “EPA’s Regulatory Train Wreck.” They say it will cost as high as $129 billion to implement the rules, which would still result in approximately 20 percent of the power generated by coal to be lost. Coal accounts for 45 percent of the power in the United States, showing the dire circumstances we face from this socialist arm of the U.S. government.

House Republicans are the best bet to stop this attack, and they need to come together and completely stop this outrage from happening.

The EPA conjured up some unprovable statistics by saying an air-transport rule disallowing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide would alone prevent 23,000 heart attacks and 21,000 cases of bronchitis, saving about 36,000 lives by 2014. They don't add how many deaths would result from power grid failures, which would expose babies and the elderly to inclement weather, as they are the most susceptible to temperature extremes.

The attack on humanity continues from the earth worshippers.