Global Warming Lie Results in Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Resigning

The outright lie by the American Physical Society, supposedly the premier physics society, that concerning man made global warming, "the evidence is incontrovertible."

Dr. Ivar Giaever, winner of the the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, resigned from the now disreputable physics society, saying simply in an email: "I resign from APS."

Giaever said in the same email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society, "In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?"

The expected backlash against the immoral physics society resulted in it placing an addendum concerning its statement. It now says, "The word 'incontrovertible' ... is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas. The observational data indicate a global surface warming of 0.74 °C (+/- 0.18 °C) since the late 19th century."

Even the use of the word 'incontrovertible' within the group itself has stirred up controversy, as it generated debate which resulting in the above statement.

Giaever said about the assertion, "The claim … is that the temperature has changed from -288.0 to -288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this 'warming' period."

His assessment lines up with the facts, which are the Earth has had warmer periods of time in the past than it is now. It also must be taken into account that the predictive models concerning man made global warming or climate change have failed time after time.

Why is all of this pursued by scientists in light of the mounting evidence their theory is wrong? They're after the grant money, for one, by attempting to appease politicians around the globe attempting to use the fake issue to shore up the fantasy of these globalists to create a world government.

The good news is the story is getting out that there has never been a consensus among scientists about man made global warming, and bold steps by men of integrity like Dr. Ivar Giaever continue to pound at the falsehoods of the climate change theory, getting the word out to the general public, which according to a Rasmussen Reports public opinion poll, now to the tune of 57 percent, understand there is a lot of disagreement among the scientific community concerning global warming.

Also very important is the growing perception among the public that at minimum, some scientists have falsified research in order to support what is increasingly being realized as a scientific religion, based upon a belief system and theories, not upon sound scientific observation and conclusions.

The bottom line: There is a continual push by those interesting in imposing a global government upon the world to either create or expand upon uncertainties which engender fear in people in order to convince them to give more and more control to governments around the world, and ultimately to a global, centralized government.

Just ask yourself the question as to why something is being pushed so fast and hard by governments, scientists and the mainstream media. When you remove the rocks, underneath them you'll usually find the one world government fetish.